Should traumatized employees be “debriefed?”

Philip Chard • January 4, 2011 • Comments (2)

Survivors of disasters or traumatic events are at significant risk for developing such problems as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, depression and substance abuse. To address this risk, organizations that have suffered a traumatic event often arrange for critical incident stress debriefings (CISD) for affected employees, hoping this short-term psychological intervention will prove helpful. But it’s not that simple.

Research reported by the Association for Psychological Science and published in the journal Psychological Science in the Public Interest, shows that the majority of employees who suffer workplace trauma recover fully within a few months or, in extreme cases, years. However, about 30% will exhibit emotional dysfunction at a significant level that, if left untreated, can become chronic.

Basically, this and other research suggests that individuals respond emotionally to disasters or traumatic events in very diverse ways. Some victims will heal without any mental health intervention. Others will require assistance in the form of “psychological first aid.” But what form should this “first aid” take?

Many organizations rely on CISD in this regard, sometimes encouraging or even requiring employees who have been traumatized to participate in individual or group “debriefings” designed to help them express their feelings and “process” the emotional impact of their experiences. However, research shows that certain individuals who participate in a CISD can actually increase their odds of developing PTSD or other emotional challenges.

Employees who respond adversely to CISD often have a coping style that involves “out of sight, out of mind.” They effectively put the event behind them and move on, sometimes fairly rapidly. However, if they are compelled to participate in a CISD, there is increased risk that the mental images and emotional responses associated with the traumatic event will be reinforced in their minds, essentially “locking in” these painful and disturbing memories.

Consequently, organizations should never require their employees to participate in a CISD. Instead, they should emphasize that each individual exercise her or his own judgment and intuition in deciding whether to attend a debriefing. If an employee seems uncertain, simply asking, “Do you feel like talking about it or not?” may help him or her make the best decision. It is important that no peer or managerial pressure be applied in these situations.

Bottom Line: If your employees suffer a traumatic event, it’s good to offer them access to CISD. However, there should be no requirement or pressure that they participate. Individual employee preferences should be respected and affirmed.

No related posts.

Tags: , , , , ,

Category: Industry Archives

About the Author

Philip joined Empathia (then NEAS) in 1987 as the Director of Clinical Services, becoming its President/CEO in 1993. In addition to his duties at Empathia, he is an award-winning newspaper columnist, author of three books, and numerous journal and magazine articles. Philip is a sought-after speaker, has been a guest expert on ABC Television’s 20/20, and has presented at the Brookings Institution, among many other venues. Prior to joining Empathia, he taught behavioral sciences at Michigan State University’s College of Human Medicine, where he received an Outstanding Faculty Award. His approach to work/life balance includes competitive sailing on the Great Lakes, wilderness backpacking and nature photography.

View Author Profile

Comments (2)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. I agree. Making a safe, confidential setting for “Volunteer” employees to share, if they want, is the accepted practice. Traumitized individuals are trying to process “normal” feelings to an unnatural situation and don’t need to be required to attend a debriefing. Allowing them to receive contact information,extra handouts is sufficient, in my opinion.

  2. Phyllis Lardinois says:

    I agree …that is a very respectful approach. We also need to be aware of children’s varying responses and the importance of helping them to connect with known and safe caregivers who can help after a crisis.
    Thanks for a great article!

Go Ahead, Speak Your Mind




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.